Date: 15 September 2006 18:20 HEALTH WATCHDOG BLASTS GOVERNMENT OVER HEALTH CUTS The Chairman of Cambridgeshire County Council's Health and Adult Social Care Scrutiny Committee has blasted the government for not intervening to stop cuts to mental health services in Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire. After months of deliberation the Secretary of State for Health Patricia Hewitt has finally handed down her decision and announced that the Government will let the service reductions go ahead. He said: "I am appalled though not surprised that the Secretary of State is so indifferent both by the time she has taken to reply and what her reply consists of - when Mental Health Services for the vulnerable in our local community for young and the elderly will now have significant cuts made tothem - it is a very black day both for the users of this service but also local opinion and democracy." The Health and Adult Social Care Scrutiny Committee originally wrote to Patricia Hewitt in February to refer the service reductions put forward by Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire Primary Care Trusts - the full County Council backed the call in a second letter in July. The letters raised concern about the PCT proposals to cut nearly £3 million from the Mental Health Services budget - savings included cutting the young people's service, closing hospital beds and day centre services, amalgamation of teams providing care and support and more reliance on community-based provision. In her reply, which arrived on September 8, Patricia Hewitt, says: My view is that the PCTs and the Trust should proceed with the proposals," and among the reasons she lists are: * That the PCT proposals are consistent with the Mental Health National Service Framework * I have reviewed the points set out in the detailed PCT rebuttal document, which I support * The Strategic Health Authority support the PCT proposals * An independent report by the Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health supported the PCT proposals * The changes have already been partly implemented and no significant identified or reported adverse impacts on access to community services or increase to the number of out of area placements have been reported * The PCT responded to the consultation by making a number of changes to their original proposals and this was acknowledged by the Scrutiny Committee. Yours John